" If it had been written, and thus deemed necessary, for the firstborn original sin to be redeemed by the suffering that, in the name of the mankind, was inflicted upon The Saviour, why was it, on the other hand, necessary to pay for this cleansing of the Human soul with another sin- the ungrattitude and crucifixion of that very Saviour?
The mankind, in its moment of redemption, through the very act of redempion itself, falls and sins again.
The sin redeemed with - a sin.
One sin replaced by another.
The superhuman sacrifice of the Christ becoming thus A PRIORI worthless...
And what happens if we induce this thought upon the human nature?...
If we use this thought of a doubt to read human history?..."